نوع مقاله : مقالۀ پژوهشی
نویسنده
عضو هیأت علمی گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
The structure of “diegesis” becomes clear by analyzing the time of narration and changing the narrator. The first-person narrator, who is present in the simultaneous narration, after a brief description of the space and characters, entrusts the string of words to the second first-person narrator. The second narrator, using a retrospective narrative, narrates a relatively eventful story. Choosing this form, while leading to a more intensive mention of events, also helps to create far-reaching and verisimilitude. This method cannot be called “metalepsis”, because although the narrator changes, each level of the narrative remains and does not enter another realm to merge the domains. It is also different from the “frame” structure, because despite being comlecated, it does not contain separate sub-stories, and the sub-narratives all serve a storyline. At first, types of narration structure were identified and described, and then the reasons for choosing this structure and its functions were investigated. The results showed that the popularity of the society and the personal motivations of the authors were the main reasons for choosing this narrative stratification. Sometimes the authors’ attempts to make the work bilingual or polyphonic and change the focus of the narrative have been successful and sometimes unsuccessful.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله