شیوة طنزپردازی فرهاد حسن زاده بر مبنای نظریة ایوان فوناژی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی.

نویسندگان

1 فردوسی مشهد

2 دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

3 دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

طنز، یکی از مهم­ترین انواع ادبی است و از راه­های متنوّعی حاصل ­می­شود. یکی از نظریه­پردازان مشهور طنز، ایوان فوناژی، زبان­شناس و روان­شناس برجستة مجارستانی است که مفاهیم مختلف طنز و کارکردهای آن را تبیین و بررسی کرده است. ازآنجاکه نظریة فوناژی در مورد طنز، دارای مصادیق متنوّع و جامع است و نگاهی هم به بررسی طنز بر مبنای آرای روان­شناسی و زبان­شناسی دارد، معیاری مناسب برای بررسی طنز در آثار مختلف ادبی است. فوناژی در نگاهی جزئی­تر و دقیق­تر، میان طنزپردازی در ژانرهای مختلف ادبی و حتّی حوزه­های متفاوت ادبیات مانند ادبیات غنایی یا ادبیات کودک، تمایزاتی قائل است. فوناژی در یک تقسیم­بندی کلّی، طنزپردازی در ادبیات داستانی کودکان را به دو نوع اصلی «انحراف از معیار» و «بازی­های زبانی» تقسیم می­کند و برای هریک از آن‌ها، مؤلّفه­ها و مصادیقی قائل است. در این جستار، داستان­های فرهاد حسن­زاده در حوزة ادبیات کودک و نوجوان با توجّه به آراء فوناژی و تقسیم­بندی او در باب روش­های طنزپردازی در ادبیات داستانی کودک نقد و بررسی شده است. در این بررسی به این نتیجه رسیده‌ایم که حسن‌زاده، از مصادیق مختلف انحراف از معیار به‌ویژه اتّصال کوتاه و تخریب حدس به‌عنوان وجه­ غالب طنزپردازی استفاده کرده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Study of the Comedy Style of Farhad Hassanzadeh based on the Thirteen Components Theory by Ivan Fonagy

نویسندگان [English]

  • alireza sezavar 1
  • Mahdokht PourkhaleghiChatroudi 2
  • Maryam Jalali 3
  • A’azam Staji 2
1 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
2 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
3 Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده [English]

Introduction

The comedy as a literary genre has always enjoyed a great acceptance in the literature and art due to its public welcome. The concept of comedy and all kinds of techniques relevant to its creation in literature, especially the literature of children and young adults, has been the topic of discussion for several times. One of the great thinkers of this era is Ivan Fonagy (1920-2005), a prominent Hungarian linguist and a psychologist whose ideas in the satire (comedy) field is of great importance due to its distinct and scientific division- which is new in many cases- as well as the all-inclusiveness of this theory, which can be used as a proper and comprehensive criterion in the study of satire in fiction, particularly the literature of children and the young adults. According to Fonagy's theory, satire in the literature of children and young adults includes thirteen components. He himself has repeatedly exploited these components in the examination of some of the world's well-known comic stories of children and adolescents. There is still no independent work on Farhad Hassanzadeh's stories (2002); however, there are two articles regarding the study of comedy in these stories: “Appearance of comedy techniques in the plot structure of stories by Farhad Hassanzadeh written by Safaee and Adhami (2014)” and also “Satire and comic styles in the stories of children and young adults of Farhad Hassanzadeh written by Khodabin et al. (2016).” The writers have mentioned some techniques and cases of the creation of satire in three sets of stories by Hassanzadeh and have provided examples for each. In the present study, the satirical techniques in the works of Hasanzadeh have been identified and investigated using the thirteen criteria of the Fonagy’s theory.

Methodology

The library research method has been used in this study in which the data were analyzed by the descriptive-analytic method using qualitative method. In other words, all the data and information contained in the books of Farhad Hassanzadeh were collected and analyzed by the library method. In this process, necessary information is extracted based on sources including articles, books, and sometimes academic papers using multiple scanning and notes. The theoretical framework of the study is based on Fonagy’s theory. Therefore, first, the thirteen indices of the Fonagy’s theory as well as his other ideas in the field of satire were extracted in order to analyze the comic texts, and then Farhad Hassanzadeh's books were analyzed based on this theory. In a general classification, Fonagy (2001) divides the satire in fiction of children into two main types of deviation from the standard and language games, while considering some components and examples for each. In the current research, taking Fonagy’s views and his classification of satirical methods in the child fiction literature into account, Hassanzadeh's (2004) stories in the field of literature of children and young adults have been criticized and analyzed. The works by Hassanzadeh (2007) which are examined in this paper include Hamshagerdi ceiling newspaper, Volume I (1999) and Volume II (2000), A Melody for Wednesdays (1998), Watermelon with love (1999), Bounced humors (2002), The Pot-headed Monster (2010), and two sets of stories At a time when Thursday and Friday were not yet invented, and A Happy Family’s Grins, as well as comic novels of Hasti (2010) and The Scorpions on the Bambek Ship (2009).

Discussion

In a general view, Fonagy has divided comedy in the fiction literature of the children into two types: deviation from the standard and language games,  each of which has instances (Fonagy, 2001, 2002, 1996, 1989).

Deviation from the standard

Fonagy considers the domain of deviation from the standard including instances of short connection, ambiguity in superstructure, strangeness of imagery forms, destruction of speculation, vitalization, and grotesque events, as he believes that a writer who is able to use all or some of these elements skillfully and elegantly, can create humor in the fiction literature of children, with enjoyment lasting for many years in the mind of the child and even the adult (Fonagy, 1998, p.109).
In the meantime, the final sentence of Fonagy is entirely realized in the writing style of Hassanzadeh (2000). Hassanzadeh is one of the writers in the area of children who has been able to attract adult audiences by creating a special style of writing and satire (2002). In all his comic stories, Hassanzadeh (2010) has a strange skill in the creation of a deviation from the standard through all kinds of examples. The deviation from the standard means that the writer performs manipulations in his narration with elegance and skill. This manipulation can involve changing the angle of view and the narration in such a way that the writer enters into a dialogue with the reader or the characters of the story. In other words, he  creates a Metanarrative or a short connection, or uses the images and imagery forms with a high degree of prominence and astonishment for the reader in his narration, or elegantly prevents guessing by the audience (Fonagy, 1998, p.  86).
Examples of deviations from the standard are as follows:

Short connection: is a kind of angle of view that is the dominant method of narration in the postmodern stories. In this approach, the writer temporarily enters into the story and talks with the heroes and characters of the story or with the readers, and even in the more intense state, also changes the fate of the main characters of the story (Payandeh, 2014, p. 149).
Strangeness of imagery forms: In the book Language in Language, he states that one of the most important characteristics of a strong and creative satirist is his creativity which is strange and pleasant for the reader (Fonagy, 2001, p. 127).
Destruction of speculation: Fonagy divides destruction of speculation into two types: 1. When narrating the story is such that the audience is completely surprised and does not expect it to end in this way (Fonagy, 2001, p. 121). 2. Another type of destruction of speculation occurs in the range of sentences and paragraphs, in which the author uses the sentence or clause in such a way that the words in their axis of association in the middle or the end of the sentence or clause, surprises the audience (Fonagy, 2001, p. 123).
Ambiguity in the superstructure of the sentence: According to Fonagy ambiguity in the sentence superstructure is achieved in two ways. 1. Sometimes, the author, in a sentence or a text, uses words or phrases at the end of the sentences that are not expected by the audience, and it has no cohesion with the axis of association of the sentencse, however this inconsistency and irrelevance makes the audience smile and enjoy (Fonagy, 2001, p. 103). Of course, it should be noted that the purpose of Fonagy from ambiguity here is the ambiguity as the lack of cohesion, astonishment, which results in surprise and not ambiguity in the grammatical sense (Smith, 2009, p. 62).
Vitalization and humanization: This is the common ground for all the satirists around the world. What is happening in humor, especially in satire, is the continuous dismemberment of the boundary between the man and animal (Cracchli, 2005, p. 50).
Grotesque: Grotesque is a kind of comedy that frightens you while making you laugh in such a way that its frightening or repelling aspect controls the laughter (Conneli, 2004, p. 396).


Language games

Language game is another effective factor in the creation of satire in children's stories which account for the following types.

Phonetic emphasis: A structure or phrase is phonetically pronounced more prominently than other structures of the sentence, but every phonetic stress does not create comics. Sometimes, a phonetic emphasis can be considered as satiric, in this case, sometimes emphasis is not required, rather it is performed for the sake of ridiculing or sneering, or to mimic someone's speech and dialect, or to portray the sound of certain events through the onomatopoeia (fonagy, 1996, p. 118).
Ambiguity in vocabulary and phrases
Pun

In the following, the frequency of using two methods of deviation from the standard and language games, as well as the frequency of using a variety of components of deviation from the standard in Hassanzadeh's stories (2012) are shown. Regarding the statistical method, it should be mentioned that based on the two general methods of satire, in the five selected stories of Hassanzadeh (2011), all the samples related to these two methods and their examples have been extracted. First, the rate of author's use of each of the two general methods is mentioned in the following, and due to the importance of the first method, i.e. the deviation from the standard, the frequency of the seven most important examples of the method of deviation from the standard was noted:
Hassanzadeh has used the method of deviation from standard in the above-mentioned five stories more than the language games for making humor. This indicates that the method of deviation from standard can be considered as his own style of creating humor. It can be observed that among various examples and components of the deviation from the standard, Hassanzadeh has used vitalization and humanization more than anything else, followed by ambiguity in the superstructure of the sentence to create humor. In addition, the components of the strangeness of the imagery forms and the destruction of speculation also have a high frequency in his works. In the two stories “The same purple shoe and A Happy Family’s Grins”, the four components mentioned above and the other components have close frequencies.

Conclusion

In the present study, according to the ideas of Fonagy (1996) regarding satire in children's fiction literature, Hassanzadeh's comedy stories in the field of children’s literature were examined. Hassanzadeh (2015) is a satirist who has well used the component of deviation from the standard and types of its examples in his works in an artistic way, and this is the most important factor in his success in the humorous stories. The writers and poets who use just language games such as puns, phonetic stress, and repetition to create satire, do not have much success in creating humor. The mere reliance on the inclusion of samples of one or two instances and the components of deviation from the standard cannot create an effective satire in the children's story. In this study, it has been found that nearly 60% of satire's styles in Hasanzadeh's stories were based on the deviation from the standard and its examples, and the author has used most instances of deviation from the criterion with almost the same rates and this factor has led to the attractiveness of his satire in his stories.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • fonagy
  • Farhad hasan zadeh
  • satire
  • Children's literature
پاینده، حسین. (1393). داستان کوتاه در ایران (جلد سوم: داستان‌های پسامدرن). تهران: نیلوفر.
حسن‌زاده، فرهاد. (1377). آهنگی برای چهارشنبه‌ها. تهران: کانون پرورش فکری کودک و نوجوان.
حسن‌زاده، فرهاد. (1378). هندوانه به شرط عشق. تهران: چرخ‌وفلک.
حسن‌زاده، فرهاد. (1382). همان لنگه‌کفش بنفش. تهران: کانون پرورش فکری کودک و نوجوان.
حسن‌زاده، فرهاد. (1389). دیو دیگ‌به‌سر. تهران: کانون پرورش فکری کودک و نوجوان. چاپ دوم.
حسن‌زاده، فرهاد. (1391ب). در روزگاری که هنوز پنجشنبه و جمعه اختراع نشده بود. تهران: چرخ‌وفلک.
حسن‌زاده، فرهاد. (1391الف). لبخندهای کشمشی یک خانوادة خوشبخت. تهران: چرخ‌وفلک.
خدابین، مریم؛ میرحسینی، زهره. (1395). «طنز و شیوه‌های طنزپردازی در داستان‌های کودک و نوجوان فرهاد حسن‌زاده». فصلنامه مطالعات ادبیّات کودک. سال اوّل. شماره 2. صص 73-53.
صفایی، علی؛ ادهمی، حسین. (1393). «نمود تکنیک‌های طنز در ساختار پیرنگ داستان‌های حسن‌زاده». فصلنامه پژوهش زبان و ادبیات فارسی. سال هفتم. شماره 32. صص 166-119.
کانلی، فرانسیس. (1383). «گروتسک». دائره‌المعارف زیبایی‌شناسی. ترجمة مشیّت علایی و دیگران. چاپ اول. تهران: مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات هنری. صص 285.
کریچلی، سیمون. (1384). در باب طنز. ترجمه سهیل سمی. تهران: ققنوس.
محمدی، محمدهادی؛ قایینی، زهره. (1384). تاریخ ادبیات کودکان ایران. جلد 6. تهران: چیستا. چاپ دوم.
نشریه اینترنتی nojavanha.com(نوجوان‌ها). (1395). مصاحبه با استاد فرهاد حسن‌زاده.
نورتون، دونا. (1382). شناخت ادبیات کودکان. گونه‌ها و کاربردها از روزن چشم کودک. دوجلدی. تهران: ستاره سبز.
fonagy, Ivan and kawaguchi, yuji. (2002). Prosody and syntax, Amsterdam: john Benjamin.
Fonagy, Ivan. (1989). Psychology and human, Amsterdam: university of Amsterdam.
Fonagy, Ivan. (1996). the approaches of satire in the literature, Paris University: the linguistics journal, no 19, pp 106-121.
Fonagy, Ivan. (1998). satire as a language, Amsterdam: john Benjamin publishing company.
Fonagy, Ivan. (2001). Language within language, Amsterdam: john Benjamin publishing company.
Scholes, Walter. (2009). a glossary of linguistic approaches, London: Routledge. -
Smith, Aron. (2009). Fonagy and satire, oxford: the association of literature studies journal, no 69, pp 56-71.